2478 Members
10 Forums
2492 Topics
71187 Posts
Max Online: 351 @ 11/12/12 04:51 PM
|
|
|
#161309 - 12/23/11 09:14 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: Ed Yetman, III]
|
King
Registered: 04/26/03
Loc: Vienna, Austria
|
Any Cochrane Gambit games? (3.Nxf7) To my surprise, quite many! I found 83 Cochrane games incl. 28 white wins. I have uploaded this selection (PGN): http://remixshare.com/download/r0p33(only ~12 seconds delay) [Event "CM.1997.0.00031"] [Site "IECG"] [Date "1997.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Koch, Christian"] [Black "Kulashko, Alexei"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C42"] [WhiteElo "2393"] [BlackElo "2390"] [PlyCount "55"] [EventDate "1997.08.01"] [EventType "corr"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nxf7 Kxf7 5. d4 c5 6. dxc5 Nc6 7. Bc4+ Be6 8. Bxe6+ Kxe6 9. O-O d5 10. Nc3 d4 11. Na4 Qc7 12. e5 Nd5 13. f4 Rd8 14. f5+ Kf7 15. Bg5 Qxe5 16. Bxd8 Nxd8 17. Re1 Ne3 18. c3 Qe4 19. Qe2 Be7 20. Rad1 Nc6 21. cxd4 Bg5 22. Nc3 Qh4 23. g3 Nxd4 24. gxh4 Nxe2+ 25. Nxe2 Nxd1 26. hxg5 Rd8 27. b4 Nb2 28. Ng3 1-0
_________________________
Regards, Mike
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#161314 - 12/24/11 06:57 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: Permanent Brain]
|
Ninja
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
|
I guess that kills the idea that the Petroff is killing centaur chess.
_________________________
Ed Yetman, III YetmanBrothers.com
"I will not be pushed, passed, isolated, blockaded, doubled, undoubled, or promoted!"--The Pawn.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#161325 - 12/25/11 08:44 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: Quasimodo]
|
Ninja
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
|
Well, I don't want to play centaurs myself. It's like trying to talk to a manniquin.
_________________________
Ed Yetman, III YetmanBrothers.com
"I will not be pushed, passed, isolated, blockaded, doubled, undoubled, or promoted!"--The Pawn.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#161329 - 12/26/11 08:39 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: Quasimodo]
|
Ninja
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
|
I feel the same way myself. But if centaurs increase the total number of chessplayers I don't have a huge objection to it. Just so long as it is out in the open. I dropped 200 ICCF points to centaurs because I didn't know I was playing them.
_________________________
Ed Yetman, III YetmanBrothers.com
"I will not be pushed, passed, isolated, blockaded, doubled, undoubled, or promoted!"--The Pawn.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#161344 - 12/29/11 06:09 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: Quasimodo]
|
Ninja
Registered: 12/28/02
Loc: Dallas, TX
|
The whole idea of centaur chess is killing chess in my not so humble opinion I don't buy that. If anything, centaur chess will eventually be so played out that people will lose interest and go back to OTB chess. The figures I posted are reflecting a trend towards more and more draws as computers and software get stronger. Stands to reason that when nobody can beat anybody on ICCF, the concept will die off. About the only thing centaur chess killed is playing human-only CC games, at least on ICCF since computer use is legal.
_________________________
What would Rybka do?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#161345 - 12/29/11 09:58 PM
Re: Are computers closing in on solving chess?
[Re: FirebrandX]
|
Ninja
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
|
I am about to start the "Traditional" Correspondence Championship of Canada. There are 7 players, including one ICCM. We play by postcard; databases are allowed, but no engines.
It is all a matter of trust, of course. But no money is at stake, so why bother to cheat?
_________________________
Ed Yetman, III YetmanBrothers.com
"I will not be pushed, passed, isolated, blockaded, doubled, undoubled, or promoted!"--The Pawn.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (1 invisible),
27
Guests
|
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|