Mig 
Greengard's ChessNinja.com

Botvinnik Memorial 2011

| Permalink | 132 comments

I rather forgot this was starting so soon, my bad. Six rounds of double round-robin rapid in Moscow to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Mikhail Botvinnik. Anand, Carlsen, Kramnik, Aronian! The first day hardly lived up to the quality of that list of names, it must be said. Blunders abounded, with Carlsen missing wins against Anand (probably) and Aronian (surely). Nice to see Kramnik continuing his new habit of sacrificing pieces, this time against Carlsen, though it ended in draw. I thought Kramnik was headed for a typically Kramnikian win over Aronian with a tempoing bishop in the endgame, but it ended in a draw quickly. Isn't 47.Bf1 headed for zugzwang rather quickly? 47.Kd7 48.Bh3+ Ke7 e4 and the knight has to move and the b-pawn looks tough to stop. (Damn computer isn't as impressed, however, so maybe we'll have to trust this Kramnik guy.) The world champion was the only one to score a victory, a nice piece of work against Aronian. The second half of the event is Saturday. It's a weird event in that the games are paused so the players can give commentary to the crowd. I'm pretty sure Botvinnik wouldn't have approved! But what the hey, he didn't much approve of the dissolution of the USSR either, so he wasn't exactly infallible.

Fun to have the four top-rated players on the new FIDE list facing off. A pity it isn't at least four rounds. All the players except Kramnik will join Ivanchuk, Nakamura, and Vallejo in the Grand Slam Masters Final starting on the 26th.

132 Comments

It was fun to see Kramnik destroy Carlsen's experiment.

Nice to see the patzer take a pasting :)

3000 rating performance by the world champion! This type of real performance - in a closed circuit event in this case, against closest rivals - is what I think makes Anand the greatest player ever! This is truly a dominating performance.

Congrats Anand for this very impressive show!

The greatest player ever? It was after all his first tournament win in 3.5 years, and rapid. In their previous rapid event a few months ago Carlsen scored +8 and Anand +1, so I think ranking the latter ahead of Kasparov is going a bit too far.

All fans - you as a Carlsen fan, Pirc Alert as an Anand fan - tend to emphasize the highlights of their heroes. "Greatest ever player" debates are futile anyway IMO, and when it comes to rapid events one cannot really make comparisons with Kasparov because he hardly played such events.

Who dominated the classical event with (almost) the same players, about a year ago in Bilbao? ,:)

Nicework against Aronian but making Anand the greatest player ever , Iam sure we are carrying a bit too too far!

Anand is a great player and doesn't require the services of his flunkey, Pirc Alert, who overblows even his fine achievements. Poor Vishy can't even with the chess oscar. He is a good world champion, but he has never been able to convincingly outdistance himself from his nearest competitors as Fischer, Karpov, and Kasparov were able to do. Maybe it isn't Vishy's fault, but it's a function of today's computer age, where other players are able to catch up. Perhaps the years of the dominant champion are over forever. Interesting to see...

"3000 rating performance" ... "real performance" ... "dominating performance" ...? Sure, Anand deserves praise for clobbering the rest of the top 4, but it was a six-round rapid event, for God's sake! A prestigeous one, absolutely, but I don't think any of the contestants will be losing too much sleep over this.

gg and others,

I would put Kasparov in the top 10 list of all time greats. But in the top and above Anand? No!

During his initial days Kasparov's competition was weak, as can be seen from a 63 old Smyslov playing in the Candidates final and also from that he had to repeatedly play Karpov. Yet he barely won against Karpov. Kasparov Anand was a private match affair that cannot be taken into account when there was no official neutral supervision. We all know Kasparov ducked Anand afterwards. Kasparov was thoroughly dominated by Kramnik in their match. The one you can tell where Kasparov dominated was the match against Short. Will that be sufficient to qualify him for the top of the list? You all will agree tournament results cannot be given much weightage and therefore the ratings obtained from that. Because they don't happen in a control environment and buy/sell or game fixing possibilities are there with help of organizers or with brand name promoters. Quick games are an indication of one's OTB skills and speed of calculation but compared to Anand, Kasparov wasn't that great and he avoided it mostly. His Simul floor was much less than Anand. One thing is clear when you see all these things. Kasparov was never prepared to take up a real challenge but all he (or his fans mainly) wanted was to just create a perception that he was the greatest. So is there much substance when you say Kasparov is the greatest of all time? Can you please show how?

Thank you.

Re: Anand not winning tournament

Why would that be an issue when Anand is winning all important matches? Like I said tournament has many flaws. The recent hilarious thing with the tournamnet is the football scoring system. These are done against Anand. You fix bottom two boards for your favorite and Anand lost it even before the tournament is started, even if his performance is greater than the tournament winner. Others would now say the tournament winner played like that only because of the format! ;) So it is not correct to attribute to Anand anything that is not in his control, like not winning a tournament in this case!

That's the worst post I've read in years. The funny thing is, you sound like you actually believe what you write!

Professor, you divert topic, instead of producing supporting arguments for Kasparov, but still is it funny??

Look what Kramnik has to say in just a few days back that I just ran into thanks to a poster Kumar in chessvibes. Haven't read it fully but a must read interview!

http://whychess.org/node/1605

"I lost to Anand, but I could also have lost to him in my very best form."

"At the given moment I don’t see who can compete with him when he’s on form. Perhaps only Carlsen in his very best condition, though probably not. I think he’ll only leave the stage when he weakens himself and ceases to maintain that extremely high level."

These are all spontaneous reactions coming out of conviction! Very serious endorsement for Anand!!

Some more about Anand from Kramnik interview..

"V.K.: I always considered him to be a colossal talent, one of the greatest in the whole history of chess. Each champion has had some sort of speciality, and his is creating counterplay in any position out of absolutely nowhere. He’s got an amazing ability to constantly stretch himself so that even in some kind of Exchange Slav he nevertheless manages to attack something and create something. He also plays absolutely brilliantly with knights, even better than Morozevich – if his knights start to jump around, particularly towards the king, then that’s that, it’s impossible to play against and they’ll just sweep away everything in their path. I noticed it’s better to get rid of them when you’re playing against him.

In general, he’s improved a great deal in recent years, at some point after 2002. He’s a chess player of genius, but previously he didn’t work enough, by and large.

V.T.: But how has he managed to improve? Did marriage help?

V.K.: Perhaps. He’s matured, while previously he lacked the character to become World Champion. I remember in 1995 against Kasparov it was enough just to poke him a little and he simply fell apart. In the match against me things were completely different. Plus, he’s started to work a great deal and now his opening preparation is among the best, if not the best. At the given moment I don’t see who can compete with him when he’s on form. Perhaps only Carlsen in his very best condition, though probably not. I think he’ll only leave the stage when he weakens himself and ceases to maintain that extremely high level.

V.T.: His weaknesses?

V.K.: The trouble is there almost aren’t any…"

The thesis must be of sufficient merit to provoke discussion. If you want to argue you must first propound your points with some evidence that can be taken seriously. Your "facts" re Kasparov are pure, unadulterated, waffle which shows you to have a good imagination but to be incapable of any objective discussion on this topic. Btw nobody is denying Anand is excellent.

@PircAlert:

First of all, I don't think anyone is trying to claim that Anand is not one of the greatest players of all time, but your attempts to "prove" that he is THE greatest don't show much of an understanding of the matter.

You don't give much "weightage" to results in major classical tournaments, but a six-round rapid event is a good basis for determining a top player's strength? Please.

And what's all this about Kasparov's opposition in his early days (before Anand emerged, I take it?) being "weak" - so weak, in fact, that he "had to ... play Karpov"! Oh dear. You know, Karpov too is an eligible candidate for the top-player-of-all-time spot. He has an absolutely crushing tournament record - but of course, again, rapid is what really matters.

Anand is a great player and a great sportsman; no one needs your weird ad hoc arguments and ignorant deprecation of other players to see that.

Leo,

"...but your attempts to "prove" that he(Anand) is THE greatest don't show much of an understanding of the matter."

By understanding of matter you mean understanding of chess or understanding of chess politics? And please explain how I don't have the understanding?

"You don't give much "weightage" to results in major classical tournaments, but a six-round rapid event is a good basis for determining a top player's strength? Please."

You may not agree but that is my point. To give more weightage to a external-factor-influenceable classical tournament result than a random-element-involved rapid, you would need to adjust tournament cross table. Probably split it into 2 with top half getting more weightage than rapid and the bottom half getting much less weight.

"Anand is a great player and a great sportsman; no one needs your weird ad hoc arguments and ignorant deprecation of other players to see that."

Don't mistake me. Certain things I am forced to bring in like the the strength of competition to counter argument like "how dominant he was" in favor of Kasparov to take out any misconceptions. But I am not saying Kasparov is not one of the greatest. He is. But he is NOT the greatest of all time as some people make him out to be. But Anand fits the bill for the greatest of all time! (If he doesn't, again please explain how. Or who do you think fits the bill and how?)

@PircAlert,

it wasn't really my intention to start any sort of debate, but ...

Perhaps it was a poor choice of words, but by "understanding of the matter" I simply mean an appreciation of, or general clue about, different players' accomplishments throughout the years (I don't see how any "chess politics" would be in play here; if you mean some sort of lobbying to determine who is the best, most of it seems to be done by you). Obviously you measure these accomplishments in a different way, and that´s fine, but you can't claim to have proven anything, any more than I or anyone else can.

I have no idea what you mean by your "external-factor-influencable" statement etc., and I don't understand how a rapid competition could possibly be more indicative of a player's comparative strength than a classical tournament - and we are talking about a career perspective, not a single event matched to another. I'm sure you've thought this through and are ready to explain it to me in detail, but let's save each other the trouble and agree to disagree.

You say Kasparov was not the greatest, but Anand is; that's a perfectly valid opinion. (I'm not sure what to think myself - if someone put a gun to my head I guess I would say Kasparov is my man, and as I said before, Karpov was a real beast too in his day.) You will notice that I used the word "opinion" instead of "fact" there, because that's all any of this can ever be, unless we 1) drag statistics into it, in which case Kasparov or Karpov would clearly come out on top, or 2) examine their actual games, which I'm not really qualified to do, and I'm betting you're not either.

In conclusion: root for whomever you like, Anand is a good choice, but don't pretend you can make anything a fact with bogus comparisons, or that a rapid win matters one iota in this context.

Over and out :)

Leo,

[quote]unless we 1) drag statistics into it, in which case Kasparov or Karpov would clearly come out on top,[/quote]

How?

Say, you run a shop but you run it only during some festive seasons where your sales are high. You shut your shop other times. What good is this statistic to compare with the sales performance of a shop that runs throughout the year? unless you do some adjustments for seasonal factors?

Is this what you call it statistics? Is that how Kasparov and Karpov stand above others??

Chortle. You just get better and better. And Anand who hasn't played in six months.
When did the the K's shut up shop? Have you any idea of how those two utterly dominated chess for many years? Are you at all aware of their contributions? In fact, do you have any idea at all of chess history? I suggest you buy a few volumes of the "Predecessors", will do you the world of good!
Reread Leo's post, it was a very good one. Over and out : )

Yes, I have some ideas of those two. One (Karpov) didn't play the preliminaries but pressurized russian federation to seed himself into the final and wouldn't allow Anand a break. All he managed was a level score in the classical part. If Anand had more time for preparation, he would have torn him apart. Another (Kasparov) played a private match where there was no supervision, no sorts of securing of seconds etc. Fearling loss he ducked Anand whenever there was a chance afterwards. How Smyslov could play upto 63 years? Is that the competition these two "dominated"?? Why wouldn't these two play until their 63 years? You don't need volumes to be written about great "Successors". The fact that they drove their predecessors out to an early retirement proves it all!!

Sigh. (Note to self: Feed troll at own risk.)

Classical games: Garry Kasparov beat Viswanathan Anand 16 to 6, with 32 draws.
Including rapid/exhibition games: Garry Kasparov beat Viswanathan Anand 26 to 8, with 43 draws.
Only rapid/exhibition games: Garry Kasparov beat Viswanathan Anand 10 to 2, with 11 draws.

Chessgames 10-2 in rapids for Kasparov vs Anand is an error because of inability to classify many games. It was more like a tie, although Gary player very few rapid tournaments and never played Amber.

Well, those above that question Kasparov's brilliance, especially as he ended the dominance of another Boa Constrictor ; Well, let me ask you, how many humans do you know that have beaten the strongest Chess computer , well while you think of an answer, Do you wish to illustrate to me How Anand has shown his genius on the floor the way Kasparov did in his hay days....!!!! Like taking that last game against Karpov in amazing fashion, when a draw was all that was req'd to secure the Title. He went for the WIN, and shocked Karpov.

The say, 'Good players see good moves, but great ones make great moves happen... Kasparov is among the likes of : Botvinnik, Alekhine, Capablanca... so where is Anand????
I dont even rate Fischer as great as the others, cause he was a one hit wonder!!! He never came out again to live under pressure, and only conquered one Russian Hero, but Kasparov has played them all....

Have a nice day bud...

"Do you wish to illustrate to me How Anand has shown his genius on the floor the way Kasparov did in his hay days....!!!! Like taking that last game against Karpov in amazing fashion, when a draw was all that was req'd to secure the Title. He went for the WIN, and shocked Karpov."

But where was the shocker when Kasparov played Kramnik? Shock got absorbed that he settled for a for 13 or so move draw when he needed a win? Oh this was not in his hay days, right? hmm. how did he get that 2850 rating?!!! (cross examination question). What was Karparov's age then when he played Kramnik?

Anyway, Anand has even gone a step further! When a 12-game match is criticized and complained about for not having enough games to prove oneself (Kasparov, Karpov need at least 12-games for chicken out draws like I know your preparation, you know my preparation, let us do a 10 move draw and we will let our seconds do a better work for the next game!), without complaining about the jet lag or needed time for settlement, Anand fought back from a game down in the sofia match and fully dominated the event. It was like a game odd match! Yet it wasn't a seesaw battle like between Kasparov and Karpov where you never knew until the last moment. Again in the final game Anand bravely fought the wild game with a never before seen precision only he can match! It is not just a game or win, it is a win with accuracy in sharp positions where move after move after move precision is required.

I'm afraid nothing much is there to tell about Anand's hay days as he has to play off the board games from Keene.

@PircAlert:
(can't resist another shot ...)

It's really quite adorable how you extol Anand (as if no one else could have shown the same "accuracy in sharp positions") and discredit Kasparov at every possible opportunity; that is your right, of course, but it makes me wonder just how much you really know about the game.

And your comments on Anand-Topalov (for the record, I was pleased to see Anand prevail): Evidently Anand was the better player in a well-fought match, and there is no doubt he is a worthy champion, but I'm not sure I would say he "fully dominated the event", or that "it wasn't a seesaw battle ... where you didn't know until the very last moment". Excuse me, but isn't that kind of exactly what it was? The match was after all only decided in the last game.

I actually sort of envy you. It must be very liberating to be able to just disregard the rules of logic, common sense and semantics that the rest of us follow like chumps.

(Now you're gonna ask me how your logic is flawed and give me more examples of how Anand is great and everyone else fake, that I won't respond to 'cause I've made my point and now I'm done, so let me just fast-forward it for you and say:
Take care, man!)

i think Anand should be considered as one of the greatest ever, even Kramnik said there is no way Anand is weaker than Kasparov, also Kramnik said Anand is the best with Knights

Great post I hope to see more, keep up the good work.

Nice taking part to the discussion. Keep up.
http://rent-holidayvilla.com/summer

Hi, just wanted to say I attended this conference last year, and found it by far the best of about 8 conferences that I attended in the field. Full of professional insight based on testing by experts that knew what they were talking about. I would certainly go again and recommend it to anyone operating in this field.

It is a very profitable post for me. I've enjoyed reading the post. It is very informative and useful post. I would like to visit the post once more its valuable content.

This is a really good post. Must admit that you are amongst the best bloggers I have read. Thanks for posting this informative article.

Wow. This blog is truly a gold mine. I have been wallowing on this for quite sometime and here I am reading about it! I will actually try these tips and let you know how they work out! Thanks again mate.

I am completely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this web-site. I’ve saved this web-page and I really intend on visiting the web site within the upcoming days.
http://www.virtual-force.com/

This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best blogger I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article

I really enjoy this theme you've got going on in your web page. What is the name of the template by the way? I was thinking of using this style for the site I am going to construct for my school project.

Really like your blog content the way you put up the things…I’ve read the topic with great interest and definitely will stick your blog routinely for other great postsklebeband bedrucken

I find it very entertaining. Whatever the state, i think TWIC is still a good place for news. I really like your post . I really appreciate that .Thanks for sharing with us.


I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging.

It sounds like Navara clearly accidentally touched the king next to the bishop he wanted to move, an obvious case of j'adoube. http://www.astrabeds.com/latex-mattresses.html

I am really glad to read it and being able to share my thoughts on it. I want to use this opportunity to say that I really love this blog. It is an amazing resource of information for my working. Thank you so much.

I visited this page first time to get info on people search and found it Very Good Job of acknowledgment and a marvelous source of info.........Thanks Admin!

we provide different kinds of with top quality and unique design.Buy discount online with free shipping and one week delivery to your door!

It's the first time I visit your website,the is very fashionable and pretty. and I like it very much

Coach Factory recommended you to buy Coach Kristin Bags, the one which can fully display women's elegance and nobleness.coach factory stores embodied both strength of style and features, as well as what else are you able to request only one bag?

Mikhail Botvinnik is a three-time World Chess Champion, he works as an electrical engineer and a computer scientist. He quoted, "I am a Jew by blood, Russian by culture, Soviet by upbringing."

He fell in love with the game when he was taught by a school friend of his eldest brother. He derive principles on thinking concrete concepts while playing the two-player board game.

http://www.college-paper.org/

Buy essays and custom write and be sure you have all information just about this good post*.

some vendors prefer the employees have terrific intelligence. The reason for this is that the corporate thinks that they're going to have people who can work nicely. The intelligence of the individuals sometimes will likely be noticeable from the grade.
http://www.ipaydayloan.com/payday-loan-lenders.html

Game developer may possibly commence growing demos to realize himself or himself in a brand new location, give the brains an amazing training be wondering images algorithms and optimizing code, or to advertise their games.
http://www.memoryfoammattress2u.com/

Very nice blog. Thanks for being considerate and posting this for us.

Cu toate acestea, nu simt că trebuie să aveţi un buget de marketing de miliarde de dolari, mai întâi şi apoi să fie capabil să obţină rezultate. Există mii de întreprinderi mici care reclama inteligent, cu un cost foarte minim.
http://www.twenty20odds.com.au/


I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site. I have saved this webpage and I truly intend on visiting the site in the upcoming days.Keep up the excellent work!


I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site. I have saved this webpage and I truly intend on visiting the site in the upcoming days.Keep up the excellent work!
send valentine day flower canada

This is a nice post in an interesting line of content, great way of bring this topic to discussion.
http://www.flowers2world.com/send_flowers_online/valentine_flowers_delivery_Canada.asp

This posting is marvelous and what a fantastic research that you have done. It has helped me a lot. thank you very much. Feel free to visit my buy portfolio lighting site.

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

Chess may help people to practice logic skill. The strategy in chess is needed logic thinking. Therefore, they will be able to use it in real life and other field.
http://expertdiablo3guides.com/

Thank you for your share of your article, and it was really wonderful, very good

I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
http://de.photoswomens.com/
http://fr.photoswomens.com/

This is my first-time visit over here. I just stumbled upon your weblog and I liked especially the ongoing conversation. From the tons of comments on your posts, I assume I am not the only person taking pleasure in reading through your website. Carry on the good work.

Chess may be a hard game to play. It is because the game use a strategy and rule to play. The should think fast and logic.
http://www.hcglevelsinpregnancy.com/

More often than not I do not post on websites, but I would just like to say that this article has compelled me to do so! Thanks for your perceptive article.

I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging.

Memory determines our consciousness also. If we have no capacity for memory, we wouldn't conscious about surround anymore.
http://www.pussy-dreams.com/niches/teens.php


Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure.

It may be a complicated video game to play. The reason for this is that the game use a technique and rule to play. The should always imagine swift and logic.
http://www.goocy.com/

We cannot move from here "I finally found the article I was looking for.thank you www.pintarbernegosiasi.com"

You can't their efforts "What does it take to dress well? Having lots of money? Well, that helps but most"

Chess might actually help individuals to observe good judgment ability. The procedure in chess is needed good judgment wondering. For that reason, they will be able to use it in actual lifestyles and different field.
http://getthisripped.com/best-workout-routines/tacfit-commando-review

You produce a great point in your own final paragraph. We couldn’t agree more together with your points. In today’s modern world, your approach to this issue is lacking in today’s kids. We need to ensure that our kids find out more on this topic so we nev

The may also help individuals to perform logic skill. The strategy in chess is required logic thinking. For that reason, they are going to be able to use it in genuine lifestyles and other field.
http://www.thecustomvinylshop.com/Wall_Stickers_By_Theme_s/44.htm

The mind game may be a tough game to play. For the reason that the sport use a technique and rule to play. The could imagine rapid and logic.
breast pump review
http://www.bestbreastpumpreviewsite.com/

this is such a great thing to know "The second half of the event is Saturday. It's a weird event in that the games are paused so the players can give commentary to the crowd. I'm pretty sure Botvinnik wouldn't have approved! But what the hey, he didn't much approve of the dissolution of the USSR either, so he wasn't exactly infallible."..more power

I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site.

I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site.valentines day flower delivery USA

I really appreciate your efforts. Thanks for sharing such a great post.

Not many people can play chess. It is because when they are little they do not play it. It is different with people in several years ago who do not know about technology.
propane generator
http://www.propanegeneratorsite.com/

The mind game could be a demanding video game to play. Reason why the game use a technique and rule to play. The may want to believe quick and logic.
http://www.callmyfling.com/

I don't think you want to take on a job like cleaning the pellet stove pipe unless you really know what you are doing because this can be a messy bear of a job. Professionals have all the right tools to do the job right. I would definitely advise letting them do the annual cleaning of your venting system http://www.pricenettools.com

Each of a good person will always been memorized by many people. And even until they have been death, they will keep memorizing them.
http://www.mapleleafpromotions.com/Custom_Magnets.html

The may also help men or women to prepare common sense skill. The technique in chess is required common sense questioning. Thus, they will be able to use it in real lifestyles and different field.
http://www.blushprom.com/

Well that’s superb article! I really like this article. It contains a lot of useful information. I can set up my new idea from this post. It gives in depth information. Thanks for this valuable information for all.
http://www.dissertationinn.co.uk/ , http://www.dissertationinn.co.uk/dissertation-topics/ , http://www.dissertationinn.co.uk/write-my-dissertation/ , http://www.dissertationinn.co.uk/dissertation-service/.

This is the ideal post for someone who desires to be familiar with this subject. You certainly place a new turn on a topic that’s been on paper about for years. Fabulous material, your post is absolutely impact a read if somebody comes across it. I didn’t grasp that this subject was so vital. You undeniably place it in perception for me.
http://www.dissertationinn.co.uk/

It could be a laborious game to play. It is because the sport use a methodology and rule to play. The may want to assume fast and logic.
http://www.smarterapps.com.au/

Games are very interesting both to play and to watch. They provide an entertainment for our brain.
http://www.webfrootz.com/services/online-marketing/search-engine-optimization/

I am once again feeling happy and proud to say that this is my favorite web site.The postings are very unique and also out standing performance with the new creativity and excellency with the new different ideas and concepts.Really I am waiting for some more new posts from you.Keep up your excellency and efficiency in this same levels.

Gloriously expert position. I merely bumbled upon your post and desired to articulate that I have really relished understanding your blog articles.

I have to say that the information here was the most complete that I found anywhere. I am definitely bookmarking this to come back and read later

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information

I am absolutely blown away at how great The Information Is On this webpage. I Have Written down this website and I intend "Truly we Visiting the site in The Next Few Days. Great Job keep Up the great work

I am once again feeling happy and proud to say that this is my favorite web site.The postings are very unique and also out standing performance with the new creativity and excellency with the new different ideas and concepts.Really I am waiting for some more new posts from you.Keep up your excellency and efficiency in this same levels.

Oh great tips. I was trying to look up relevant articles about my problems regarding tracking. This really a great help.

The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept.
http://www.essaymojo.co.uk/dissertation-writing.php
http://www.essaymojo.co.uk/dissertation-proposal.php

Todays chess isn't a preferred. Reason why guys have extra choice to play online game. Chess will likely be categorized as one of the crucial culture game.
http://www.computertooslow.com/

Really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us.

Chess may be a not easy online game to play. For the reason that the game use a strategy and rule to play. The should always imagine rapid and logic.
http://www.greenrayvehicles.com/

Chess might be useful people to perform common sense talent. The technique in chess is required common sense considering. For that reason, they will be able to use it in precise life and different field.
http://www.ifreebee.co.uk/free-ipad.html

Not lots of people can play chess. This is because after they are little they don't play it. That is completely different with individuals in different years in the past who don't know about technology.
http://www.duro-design.com/index.cfm/bamboo-flooring/

I suggest this site to my friends so it could be useful & informative for them also. Great effort.

Nice effort, very informative, this will help me to complete my task

Not nearly all people can play chess. The reason for this is that when they are little they do not play it. It is totally different with people in several years ago who have no idea about technology.
http://flv2mp3.com/

Nice to see it continuing its new habit of sacrificing pieces, this time against, though it ended in draw. I thought it was headed for a typically win over Aronian with a tempoing bishop in the endgame, but it ended in a draw quickly.

Now chess is not a well-liked. The reason for this is that people have greater option to play game. Chess will be categorised as among the many subculture game.
http://www.puddlescollection.com/boys/boys-suits-1.html

Not lots of individuals can play chess. The reason for this is that once they are little they don't play it. It is completely different with individuals in different years in the past who have no idea about technology.
http://www.breezedirect.com.au/

Not many individuals can play chess. For the reason that once they are little they do not play it. It is varied with guys in numerous years ago who have no idea about technology.
http://multifitblades.com/rockwell-sonicrafter-adapter.html

It has helped me a lot. thank you very much. http://my.foto75.in.ua/airjordan/Feel free to visit my buy portfolio lighting site.

Such a great way to commemorate the death of Mr. Mikhail Botvinnik. It's not everyday that people get to be in one historical event. Feel free to connect with and check out my blog at http://www.annuityace.com/annuities/fixed-index-annuities/

like your website. This is a cool site and I wanted to post a comment to let you know, nice job!

Not many people can play chess. It is because when they are little they do not play it. That's varied with men or women in different years in the past who do not know about technology.
http://www.car-covers-boat-covers.com/catalog/Boat-2-1.html

very good information....

Nowadays, chess associated with from the old school online video sport. This kind of board game just isn't familiar with the young people. Now, these people play system online video sport regarding having a good time.
http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/a-b-testing.php

You will always be remembered Mr. Botvinnik!

People who accept engineering might not understand chess. They might know it in the particular virtual game. The particular board game continues to be still quit by individuals.
http://www.kingglock.com/Content.aspx?PAGE=Glock%20Triggers

Did you create this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz answer back as I'm looking to design my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. thanks a lot
Wow! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It's on a completely different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Superb choice of colors!
Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the images aren't loading correctly. know more information please contact me (Michael Ling ) http://www.marklinecatering.com or

http://www.chinacateringequipment.com

Those who experience technology might not know chess. They could understand it but in the particular electronic online video sport. The actual game may be left simply by simply people.
http://unlocked-iphone.org/blog/unlock-iphone-4s/be-the-first-to-unlock-iphone-4s-5-0-1-here-are-the-advantages

Individuals who skip to experience chess can enjoy in the pc. Digital camera recreation model may be for sale in a number of types. People can choose which is the greatest.
http://www.ebookbay.com/

I have enjoy your blog while reading. I definitely share your views to my close friends keeps up the god work going.
http://a-1fenceproducts.com/security_gates.htm

People who live with technology may not know chess. They may know it but in the virtual game. The board game has been left by people.
http://www.aclsrecertificationonline.com/

Today, chess is a component of with the old school game. This type of game isn't familiar with the young adults. Currently, these people play system recreation with regard to having fun.
http://www.gov-auctions.org/

The pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are permitted to remain children all our lives.

Memory is a part of human brain. It allows human to remind many things that happened in the past.
http://www.sendflowers.ru/eng/flowers-russia-saint_petersburg/

Thanks for an excellent article! I appreciate your insights and agree with what you wrote.

I think it's already the tragedy in the past time. Now they have to keep developing some new things anymore.
http://www.globaltelesis.com/

People who accept technology might not know mentally stimulating games. They may know it however in the actual virtual game. The game has been remaining simply by simply folks.
http://www.sellyourhouseuk.com/

Chess is really a traditional game. It has been enjoyed since a long time ago. Next, now it is made in digicam model to produce the actual youthful technology realize it.
http://howtobuildateslagenerator.com/articles/

Chess is a classic game. It has been played since a long time ago. Then, now it is made in the digital version to make the young generation know it.
http://blog.sooking.me/

I appreciated your kind way of knowledge.Great Stuff Here..hope more to come.
http://www.essayhelppros.co.uk/cheap-essays.php
http://www.essayhelppros.co.uk/university-essays.php

I would appreciate you that you pick up an important topic to write a thoroughly informative post on. I hope that you never stop and keep posting such valuable content on this site. I am truly thrilled and now going to ask my Custom Essays writing service provider to write me an essay on this topic.

I really appreciate this post...I think I can post my topics here next time...

Twitter Updates

    Follow me on Twitter

     

    Archives

    About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by Mig published on September 3, 2011 4:08 AM.

    World Cup 2011 r3: Elo's a Bitch was the previous entry in this blog.

    Speed Wasn't a Bad Movie is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.